Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
HC dismissed contempt proceedings against respondents 5 and 6 after accepting their uncontroverted explanations in show cause responses, as petitioner filed no rejoinder. Court found illegal recovery by State respondents and directed refund with 9% per annum simple interest from recovery date until refund date, payable within six weeks. State respondents ordered to pay Rs. 10,000 costs to petitioner within same timeframe due to illegal recovery causing litigation. Writ application disposed of with directions for monetary relief and interest compensation to petitioner.
HC dismissed contempt proceedings against respondents 5 and 6 after accepting their uncontroverted explanations in show cause responses, as petitioner filed no rejoinder. Court found illegal recovery by State respondents and directed refund with 9% per annum simple interest from recovery date until refund date, payable within six weeks. State respondents ordered to pay Rs. 10,000 costs to petitioner within same timeframe due to illegal recovery causing litigation. Writ application disposed of with directions for monetary relief and interest compensation to petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.