Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
HC dismissed contempt proceedings against respondents 5 and 6 after accepting their uncontroverted explanations in show cause responses, as petitioner filed no rejoinder. Court found illegal recovery by State respondents and directed refund with 9% per annum simple interest from recovery date until refund date, payable within six weeks. State respondents ordered to pay Rs. 10,000 costs to petitioner within same timeframe due to illegal recovery causing litigation. Writ application disposed of with directions for monetary relief and interest compensation to petitioner.
HC dismissed contempt proceedings against respondents 5 and 6 after accepting their uncontroverted explanations in show cause responses, as petitioner filed no rejoinder. Court found illegal recovery by State respondents and directed refund with 9% per annum simple interest from recovery date until refund date, payable within six weeks. State respondents ordered to pay Rs. 10,000 costs to petitioner within same timeframe due to illegal recovery causing litigation. Writ application disposed of with directions for monetary relief and interest compensation to petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
