Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed Revenue's appeal for statistical purposes in short-term capital gains dispute. Assessee sold land, and CIT(A)/NFAC directed AO to compute capital gains by deducting fair market value from sale consideration. ITAT held that when actual cost of asset is available, fair market value deduction is inappropriate for determining capital gains. However, since AO's order was ex-parte and treatment of other co-owners remained unclear, ITAT restored matter to AO for fresh determination. AO directed to decide issue afresh after providing due hearing opportunity to assessee, considering treatment of other co-partners, and allowing assessee to substantiate case with requisite details in accordance with law.
ITAT allowed Revenue's appeal for statistical purposes in short-term capital gains dispute. Assessee sold land, and CIT(A)/NFAC directed AO to compute capital gains by deducting fair market value from sale consideration. ITAT held that when actual cost of asset is available, fair market value deduction is inappropriate for determining capital gains. However, since AO's order was ex-parte and treatment of other co-owners remained unclear, ITAT restored matter to AO for fresh determination. AO directed to decide issue afresh after providing due hearing opportunity to assessee, considering treatment of other co-partners, and allowing assessee to substantiate case with requisite details in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
