Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that TCS under Section 206C(1C) of IT Act is not applicable to compounding fees collected from illegal miners/transporters under MMDR Act. The court ruled that Section 206C(1C) mandates TCS collection only from lease holders, license holders, or parties with contractual rights in mines who pay royalty to State Government through District Mining Officer. Compounding fees collected under Section 23A of MMDR Act read with Rule 71(5) of Chhattisgarh Minor Mineral Rules, 2015 from illegal mining offenders are distinct from royalty payments. The court emphasized that royalty and compounding fees are mutually exclusive terms with no legislative mandate to collect TCS on compounding fees. ITAT's judgment imposing TCS demand, interest, and penalty was set aside, with substantial question of law decided favoring assessee against Revenue.
HC held that TCS under Section 206C(1C) of IT Act is not applicable to compounding fees collected from illegal miners/transporters under MMDR Act. The court ruled that Section 206C(1C) mandates TCS collection only from lease holders, license holders, or parties with contractual rights in mines who pay royalty to State Government through District Mining Officer. Compounding fees collected under Section 23A of MMDR Act read with Rule 71(5) of Chhattisgarh Minor Mineral Rules, 2015 from illegal mining offenders are distinct from royalty payments. The court emphasized that royalty and compounding fees are mutually exclusive terms with no legislative mandate to collect TCS on compounding fees. ITAT's judgment imposing TCS demand, interest, and penalty was set aside, with substantial question of law decided favoring assessee against Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
