Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal regarding classification of imported relays. The tribunal distinguished between CTH 8536 4900 covering simplicitor relays used in telecommunication and signaling apparatus, and CTH 8537 1000 encompassing complex control boards with multiple functions. The imported F650 Feeder Protection and Bay Controller System constituted multifunctional products properly classifiable under CTH 8537 1000, not qualifying for exemption under N/N. 21/2002-Customs which applies only to simple relays. Revenue's invocation of extended limitation period failed as no suppression or misdeclaration occurred when classification was based on expert opinion and technical literature. The demand fell beyond normal limitation period and could not be sustained. The appellant's classification under CTH 8537 1000 was upheld, confirming ineligibility for the customs notification exemption.
CESTAT allowed the appeal regarding classification of imported relays. The tribunal distinguished between CTH 8536 4900 covering simplicitor relays used in telecommunication and signaling apparatus, and CTH 8537 1000 encompassing complex control boards with multiple functions. The imported F650 Feeder Protection and Bay Controller System constituted multifunctional products properly classifiable under CTH 8537 1000, not qualifying for exemption under N/N. 21/2002-Customs which applies only to simple relays. Revenue's invocation of extended limitation period failed as no suppression or misdeclaration occurred when classification was based on expert opinion and technical literature. The demand fell beyond normal limitation period and could not be sustained. The appellant's classification under CTH 8537 1000 was upheld, confirming ineligibility for the customs notification exemption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
