Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
DSC denied regular bail to the applicant charged with fraudulent availment and passing of ineligible input tax credits constituting economic offences. The court determined that economic offences affecting public interest require stringent approach given their impact on the country's financial health. With GST evasion totaling Rs. 358.77 crores and ongoing investigation, the court found substantial risk of evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and flight considering the applicant's influential position. The gravity of the large-scale fraud involving deep-rooted conspiracy and significant public fund losses warranted rejection of bail application to protect the investigation's integrity and public interest.
DSC denied regular bail to the applicant charged with fraudulent availment and passing of ineligible input tax credits constituting economic offences. The court determined that economic offences affecting public interest require stringent approach given their impact on the country's financial health. With GST evasion totaling Rs. 358.77 crores and ongoing investigation, the court found substantial risk of evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and flight considering the applicant's influential position. The gravity of the large-scale fraud involving deep-rooted conspiracy and significant public fund losses warranted rejection of bail application to protect the investigation's integrity and public interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
