Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that additional income declared by assessee during survey u/s 133A relating to unexplained stock should be taxed as business income at normal rates rather than under sections 69/69C read with section 115BBE. The tribunal found that since assessee's sole source of income was retail shoe trading with no other business activities discovered during survey or subsequently, the excess stock constituted business income. Following precedent in Bajargan Traders, ITAT upheld CIT(A)/NFAC order directing assessment officer to treat additional income as normal business income instead of applying penal provisions. Revenue's appeal was dismissed, confirming taxation at regular business income rates rather than higher rates under unexplained investment provisions.
ITAT held that additional income declared by assessee during survey u/s 133A relating to unexplained stock should be taxed as business income at normal rates rather than under sections 69/69C read with section 115BBE. The tribunal found that since assessee's sole source of income was retail shoe trading with no other business activities discovered during survey or subsequently, the excess stock constituted business income. Following precedent in Bajargan Traders, ITAT upheld CIT(A)/NFAC order directing assessment officer to treat additional income as normal business income instead of applying penal provisions. Revenue's appeal was dismissed, confirming taxation at regular business income rates rather than higher rates under unexplained investment provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.