Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The AT dismissed the appeal challenging property attachment under money laundering proceedings involving large-scale misappropriation of scholarship funds. The tribunal rejected appellant's contention that no prosecution complaint was filed within 365 days, holding that attachment proceedings protect property until investigation conclusion and trial completion. The tribunal found sufficient evidence linking appellant to money laundering offenses, noting appellant's admission regarding fund sources from the consultancy company operating the educational institute. The tribunal emphasized that properties can be attached from any person possessing proceeds of crime, regardless of whether they are accused in the predicate offense. The tribunal concluded sufficient incriminating material existed against appellants for receiving proceeds of crime, dismissing all grounds of appeal.
The AT dismissed the appeal challenging property attachment under money laundering proceedings involving large-scale misappropriation of scholarship funds. The tribunal rejected appellant's contention that no prosecution complaint was filed within 365 days, holding that attachment proceedings protect property until investigation conclusion and trial completion. The tribunal found sufficient evidence linking appellant to money laundering offenses, noting appellant's admission regarding fund sources from the consultancy company operating the educational institute. The tribunal emphasized that properties can be attached from any person possessing proceeds of crime, regardless of whether they are accused in the predicate offense. The tribunal concluded sufficient incriminating material existed against appellants for receiving proceeds of crime, dismissing all grounds of appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.