Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order passed against deceased assessee where proceedings continued without involving legal representatives. CIT(A) issued four notices after assessee's death despite AO being informed of death through letter dated 18.6.2018 with death certificate and will. CIT(A) passed order on 8.6.2023 in name of assessee who died on 8.9.2018, rendering order unsustainable. Legal representatives were denied opportunity to present case before CIT(A). ITAT admitted additional evidence under Rule 29 including bank statements, sale deeds, and will copies. Matter remanded to CIT(A) with directions to consider additional evidence and decide afresh after providing reasonable hearing opportunity to legal representatives. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order passed against deceased assessee where proceedings continued without involving legal representatives. CIT(A) issued four notices after assessee's death despite AO being informed of death through letter dated 18.6.2018 with death certificate and will. CIT(A) passed order on 8.6.2023 in name of assessee who died on 8.9.2018, rendering order unsustainable. Legal representatives were denied opportunity to present case before CIT(A). ITAT admitted additional evidence under Rule 29 including bank statements, sale deeds, and will copies. Matter remanded to CIT(A) with directions to consider additional evidence and decide afresh after providing reasonable hearing opportunity to legal representatives. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
