Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order passed against deceased assessee where proceedings continued without involving legal representatives. CIT(A) issued four notices after assessee's death despite AO being informed of death through letter dated 18.6.2018 with death certificate and will. CIT(A) passed order on 8.6.2023 in name of assessee who died on 8.9.2018, rendering order unsustainable. Legal representatives were denied opportunity to present case before CIT(A). ITAT admitted additional evidence under Rule 29 including bank statements, sale deeds, and will copies. Matter remanded to CIT(A) with directions to consider additional evidence and decide afresh after providing reasonable hearing opportunity to legal representatives. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order passed against deceased assessee where proceedings continued without involving legal representatives. CIT(A) issued four notices after assessee's death despite AO being informed of death through letter dated 18.6.2018 with death certificate and will. CIT(A) passed order on 8.6.2023 in name of assessee who died on 8.9.2018, rendering order unsustainable. Legal representatives were denied opportunity to present case before CIT(A). ITAT admitted additional evidence under Rule 29 including bank statements, sale deeds, and will copies. Matter remanded to CIT(A) with directions to consider additional evidence and decide afresh after providing reasonable hearing opportunity to legal representatives. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.