Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal regarding classification of rental income under correct head of income. The assessee had treated rental income as business income rather than house property income while filing returns. The Coordinate Bench in assessee's own case for A.Y. 2011-12 previously held that assessee's rental income was assessable as "Income from Business." The Departmental Representative conceded that facts and circumstances for the current year were identical to A.Y. 2011-12, which was decided in assessee's favor. ITAT found no infirmity in CIT(A)'s order allowing the assessee to classify rental income as business income instead of house property income, upholding the lower authority's decision against the revenue.
ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal regarding classification of rental income under correct head of income. The assessee had treated rental income as business income rather than house property income while filing returns. The Coordinate Bench in assessee's own case for A.Y. 2011-12 previously held that assessee's rental income was assessable as "Income from Business." The Departmental Representative conceded that facts and circumstances for the current year were identical to A.Y. 2011-12, which was decided in assessee's favor. ITAT found no infirmity in CIT(A)'s order allowing the assessee to classify rental income as business income instead of house property income, upholding the lower authority's decision against the revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
