Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
The petitioner's GST registration was cancelled via Form GST REG-19 due to failure to file returns for six consecutive months. The HC applied the precedent established in Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Centre v. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner, which balanced revenue interests with taxpayer rights. Following this precedent and its recent application in Tvl.Blue Diamond Engineers, the HC directed the petitioner to comply with conditions stipulated in the Suguna Cutpiece Centre decision. Upon compliance with these specified conditions, the impugned cancellation order would be quashed. The writ petition was allowed at the admission stage, providing conditional relief to the petitioner subject to fulfilling the prescribed requirements.
The petitioner's GST registration was cancelled via Form GST REG-19 due to failure to file returns for six consecutive months. The HC applied the precedent established in Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Centre v. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner, which balanced revenue interests with taxpayer rights. Following this precedent and its recent application in Tvl.Blue Diamond Engineers, the HC directed the petitioner to comply with conditions stipulated in the Suguna Cutpiece Centre decision. Upon compliance with these specified conditions, the impugned cancellation order would be quashed. The writ petition was allowed at the admission stage, providing conditional relief to the petitioner subject to fulfilling the prescribed requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
