Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal granting relief under section 89(1) read with Rule 21A(1)(a) regarding lumpsum ex-gratia payment received from employer. Assessee, employed as maintenance department labourer earning approximately Rs. 18,000 monthly, received ex-gratia payment following company shutdown due to heavy losses. ITAT relied on coordinate bench decision in identical circumstances where relief under section 89(1) was permitted for lumpsum payments to employees. Tribunal found facts substantially similar and concluded assessee entitled to statutory relief for employer's lumpsum ex-gratia payment upon company closure.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal granting relief under section 89(1) read with Rule 21A(1)(a) regarding lumpsum ex-gratia payment received from employer. Assessee, employed as maintenance department labourer earning approximately Rs. 18,000 monthly, received ex-gratia payment following company shutdown due to heavy losses. ITAT relied on coordinate bench decision in identical circumstances where relief under section 89(1) was permitted for lumpsum payments to employees. Tribunal found facts substantially similar and concluded assessee entitled to statutory relief for employer's lumpsum ex-gratia payment upon company closure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.