Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Page of 4920
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 98394 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT ruled on transfer pricing comparable selection for appellant engaged in software development services to associated enterprise on cost-plus markup basis. Tribunal excluded six companies from comparables: Tata Elxsi Limited due to diversified activities including animation/VFX services creating functional dissimilarity; Persistent Systems Limited for functional dissimilarity and being giant company; Aspire Systems for extraordinary amalgamation event and turnover filter; Infosys Limited as captive service provider incomparable to appellant's cost-plus model; Thirdware Solutions for functional differences and intangible asset ownership; Cybage Software for providing different services. However, Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited and Infobeans Technologies Limited were retained as comparables since appellant originally selected them in transfer pricing documentation. Regarding bad debt provisions, ITAT upheld that provisions are not operating expenses for profit level indicator computation, distinguishing from actual write-offs.
ITAT ruled on transfer pricing comparable selection for appellant engaged in software development services to associated enterprise on cost-plus markup basis. Tribunal excluded six companies from comparables: Tata Elxsi Limited due to diversified activities including animation/VFX services creating functional dissimilarity; Persistent Systems Limited for functional dissimilarity and being giant company; Aspire Systems for extraordinary amalgamation event and turnover filter; Infosys Limited as captive service provider incomparable to appellant's cost-plus model; Thirdware Solutions for functional differences and intangible asset ownership; Cybage Software for providing different services. However, Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited and Infobeans Technologies Limited were retained as comparables since appellant originally selected them in transfer pricing documentation. Regarding bad debt provisions, ITAT upheld that provisions are not operating expenses for profit level indicator computation, distinguishing from actual write-offs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.