Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT quashed reassessment notice u/s 148 issued beyond three-year limitation period. Assessee engaged in derivative trading, booking profits within seconds by purchasing and immediately selling scrips at higher rates. AO alleged non-genuine profits constituted escaped income. Tribunal held mandatory conditions under s.149(1)(b) not satisfied as AO possessed no evidence of assets representing escaped income, no expenditure escaped assessment, and trading entries were already disclosed in books and credited to P&L account. Since profits were utilized for loan repayment and transactions were properly recorded, no income escaped assessment. Notice being time-barred and lacking statutory compliance was quashed. Assessee's appeal allowed.
ITAT quashed reassessment notice u/s 148 issued beyond three-year limitation period. Assessee engaged in derivative trading, booking profits within seconds by purchasing and immediately selling scrips at higher rates. AO alleged non-genuine profits constituted escaped income. Tribunal held mandatory conditions under s.149(1)(b) not satisfied as AO possessed no evidence of assets representing escaped income, no expenditure escaped assessment, and trading entries were already disclosed in books and credited to P&L account. Since profits were utilized for loan repayment and transactions were properly recorded, no income escaped assessment. Notice being time-barred and lacking statutory compliance was quashed. Assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.