Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC allowed the civil revision application and quashed the trial court's order dated 23.11.2023. The court held that respondent's suit filed on 21.02.2022 against applicant company was barred under moratorium provisions of Section 14 IBC, which remained effective from 30.08.2021 to 19.05.2023. The suit was filed during subsistence of moratorium while suppressing this material fact. HC ruled that plaint was liable for rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC, as IBC being special legislation with overriding effect prohibited initiation of proceedings during moratorium period. The trial court's refusal to reject the plaint was erroneous and contrary to settled legal position regarding moratorium's binding effect.
HC allowed the civil revision application and quashed the trial court's order dated 23.11.2023. The court held that respondent's suit filed on 21.02.2022 against applicant company was barred under moratorium provisions of Section 14 IBC, which remained effective from 30.08.2021 to 19.05.2023. The suit was filed during subsistence of moratorium while suppressing this material fact. HC ruled that plaint was liable for rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC, as IBC being special legislation with overriding effect prohibited initiation of proceedings during moratorium period. The trial court's refusal to reject the plaint was erroneous and contrary to settled legal position regarding moratorium's binding effect.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
