Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT remanded penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) to AO for fresh adjudication. Assessee had suo moto disallowed expenses u/s 40(a) but raised plea of continuous losses negating tax advantage only before Tribunal. ITAT admitted additional evidence regarding loss claims with DR's consent, despite not being raised before CIT(A) or AO initially. Tribunal directed AO to verify assessee's loss claims for relevant and preceding assessment years in light of jurisdictional High Court judgment, then determine penalty liability accordingly. Matter remanded with direction to afford reasonable hearing opportunity to assessee in fresh proceedings.
ITAT remanded penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) to AO for fresh adjudication. Assessee had suo moto disallowed expenses u/s 40(a) but raised plea of continuous losses negating tax advantage only before Tribunal. ITAT admitted additional evidence regarding loss claims with DR's consent, despite not being raised before CIT(A) or AO initially. Tribunal directed AO to verify assessee's loss claims for relevant and preceding assessment years in light of jurisdictional High Court judgment, then determine penalty liability accordingly. Matter remanded with direction to afford reasonable hearing opportunity to assessee in fresh proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.