Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
ITAT remanded penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) to AO for fresh adjudication. Assessee had suo moto disallowed expenses u/s 40(a) but raised plea of continuous losses negating tax advantage only before Tribunal. ITAT admitted additional evidence regarding loss claims with DR's consent, despite not being raised before CIT(A) or AO initially. Tribunal directed AO to verify assessee's loss claims for relevant and preceding assessment years in light of jurisdictional High Court judgment, then determine penalty liability accordingly. Matter remanded with direction to afford reasonable hearing opportunity to assessee in fresh proceedings.
ITAT remanded penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) to AO for fresh adjudication. Assessee had suo moto disallowed expenses u/s 40(a) but raised plea of continuous losses negating tax advantage only before Tribunal. ITAT admitted additional evidence regarding loss claims with DR's consent, despite not being raised before CIT(A) or AO initially. Tribunal directed AO to verify assessee's loss claims for relevant and preceding assessment years in light of jurisdictional High Court judgment, then determine penalty liability accordingly. Matter remanded with direction to afford reasonable hearing opportunity to assessee in fresh proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
