Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging PCIT's revision order under section 263. The AO had reopened assessment under section 147 regarding Rs. 11 lacs income, which was satisfactorily explained by assessee after proper verification. PCIT directed AO to reassess other transactions of Rs. 50 lacs that came to PCIT's notice independently. ITAT held PCIT lacked jurisdiction to direct assessment of income not originally subject to section 147 proceedings, as AO's jurisdiction under section 147 is limited to specific income believed to have escaped assessment. Since AO had properly verified the Rs. 11 lacs transaction and accepted returned income, and the Rs. 50 lacs transactions were not part of original reassessment scope, PCIT's revision order was set aside for exceeding jurisdictional limits.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging PCIT's revision order under section 263. The AO had reopened assessment under section 147 regarding Rs. 11 lacs income, which was satisfactorily explained by assessee after proper verification. PCIT directed AO to reassess other transactions of Rs. 50 lacs that came to PCIT's notice independently. ITAT held PCIT lacked jurisdiction to direct assessment of income not originally subject to section 147 proceedings, as AO's jurisdiction under section 147 is limited to specific income believed to have escaped assessment. Since AO had properly verified the Rs. 11 lacs transaction and accepted returned income, and the Rs. 50 lacs transactions were not part of original reassessment scope, PCIT's revision order was set aside for exceeding jurisdictional limits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.