Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CESTAT upheld penalty imposed on customs broker under Regulation 18 of CBLR 2013 for mis-declaration of goods' weight in two bills of entry. The appellant contended lack of knowledge regarding importer's mis-declaration, arguing Regulation 11(d) cannot apply without broker's awareness. CESTAT rejected this defense, holding that customs brokers must exercise due diligence and prudence expected of reasonable persons. The regulation mandates brokers to advise clients on legal compliance and report non-compliance to customs authorities. The tribunal found broker failed to notice weight discrepancies in weighment slips during clearance process, constituting blameworthy conduct. Considering no disproportionate revenue loss and penalty's proportionality, CESTAT concluded the original authority's decision was neither arbitrary nor procedurally improper, dismissing the appeal.
CESTAT upheld penalty imposed on customs broker under Regulation 18 of CBLR 2013 for mis-declaration of goods' weight in two bills of entry. The appellant contended lack of knowledge regarding importer's mis-declaration, arguing Regulation 11(d) cannot apply without broker's awareness. CESTAT rejected this defense, holding that customs brokers must exercise due diligence and prudence expected of reasonable persons. The regulation mandates brokers to advise clients on legal compliance and report non-compliance to customs authorities. The tribunal found broker failed to notice weight discrepancies in weighment slips during clearance process, constituting blameworthy conduct. Considering no disproportionate revenue loss and penalty's proportionality, CESTAT concluded the original authority's decision was neither arbitrary nor procedurally improper, dismissing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
