Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ---- ❯
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ---- ❯
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
☰   Show Results ❯
    Sufficient Cause for Delay Requires a Pleaded Explanation; Unexplained Inaction Leaves Revenue Appeal Time-Barred Under Limitation Law
    Angadia cash-transit receipts are taxable only to the extent of embedded commission, rather than as unexplained principal funds.
    Reassessment on Borrowed Satisfaction Fails When Recorded Share Transactions Were Already Examined and Accepted in Scrutiny
    Leasehold land rights under Section 56(2)(x): purchase excluded from income-tax additions on the facts presented.
    Revision jurisdiction cannot create a fresh foundation for independent cash-transaction penalty proceedings after a completed assessment.
    Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
    Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
    Final assessment limitation follows DRP-specific timelines when the draft order is timely, despite expiry of general assessment limits.
    Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
    Accommodation-entry loan additions require evidence beyond generic third-party allegations, while interest disallowance needs proof of actual incurren...
    Comparable uncontrolled price method requires actual uncontrolled transactions, resulting in deletion of unsupported related-party loan interest adjus...
    Limitation for section 271D penalties requires a timely order, making orders beyond the statutory period invalid.
    Service of reassessment notice remains a jurisdictional precondition; participation after inquiry notice cannot cure non-service.
    Reassessment based on third-party information upheld, while profit element in fictitious purchases remains subject to estimated disallowance.
    Notice under section 143(2) is mandatory for section 153C assessments, and its complete absence invalidates assessments.
    Search assessment jurisdiction requires a valid assessment block, asset-linked escaped income, incriminating material, and timely completion.
    Royalty benchmarking requires reliable uncontrolled comparables, supporting TNMM aggregation where technical know-how payments are tied to manufacturi...
    Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
    Year-end accruals under consistent accounting remain deductible; duplicate taxation, invalid remands, and uninitiated penalties cannot stand.
    Sufficient cause for delayed Customs appeals excludes unexplained administrative inaction and unsupported blame placed on former counsel.
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

HC dismissed petitioner's challenge to warrant of authorization...

Petitioner cannot challenge seizure warrant after assessment finalization and appeal dismissal under Income Tax Act

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax June 20, 2025 Case Laws HC
HC dismissed petitioner's challenge to warrant of authorization regarding seizure of gold jewellery worth Rs. 1,07,70,042. Following seizure, Income Tax Authority served notices under Sections 142(1) and 143(2) of Income Tax Act, passed final assessment order on 24.12.2019 creating demand of Rs. 1.08 crores. Petitioner's appeal against assessment order was dismissed. Court held petitioner cannot challenge warrant of authorization after finalization of assessment proceedings and dismissal of appeal. Income Tax Authority properly rejected release application due to pending tax demand. Court ruled petition misconceived as proper remedy lies before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 132-B of Income Tax Act. Petition dismissed.

Topics

Acts Income Tax