Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that respondents' recovery of amount from petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger/Electronic Cash Ledger under Section 79 of GST Act, 2017 was illegal and arbitrary. Court found that pursuant to Section 78, recovery proceedings cannot be initiated within three months of demand becoming payable unless reasons are recorded. Additionally, under Section 112(9), deposit of 10% of demand stays remaining amount, with three-month limitation for appeal filing. CBIC circular dated 11.07.2024 permits pre-deposit even when appellate tribunals are not constituted. Since respondents recovered amount on 29.01.2025 without complying with statutory requirements, HC quashed and set aside the recovery action. Petition allowed.
HC held that respondents' recovery of amount from petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger/Electronic Cash Ledger under Section 79 of GST Act, 2017 was illegal and arbitrary. Court found that pursuant to Section 78, recovery proceedings cannot be initiated within three months of demand becoming payable unless reasons are recorded. Additionally, under Section 112(9), deposit of 10% of demand stays remaining amount, with three-month limitation for appeal filing. CBIC circular dated 11.07.2024 permits pre-deposit even when appellate tribunals are not constituted. Since respondents recovered amount on 29.01.2025 without complying with statutory requirements, HC quashed and set aside the recovery action. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
