Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
HC ruled that the petitioner, providing design and engineering services to foreign recipients on a principal-to-principal basis, does not constitute an agency relationship. The court determined that the petitioner is an independent entity supplying services directly to its foreign counterparts, thereby qualifying as zero-rated supplies under Section 2(6) of IGST Act. Consequently, the petitioner is entitled to refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit relating to export services, including statutory interest under Section 56 of CGST Act. The petition was allowed, mandating the tax authorities to process the refund claim.
HC ruled that the petitioner, providing design and engineering services to foreign recipients on a principal-to-principal basis, does not constitute an agency relationship. The court determined that the petitioner is an independent entity supplying services directly to its foreign counterparts, thereby qualifying as zero-rated supplies under Section 2(6) of IGST Act. Consequently, the petitioner is entitled to refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit relating to export services, including statutory interest under Section 56 of CGST Act. The petition was allowed, mandating the tax authorities to process the refund claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
