Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC quashed tax proceedings initiated against a dissolved company under GST Act, finding the impugned orders were passed without application of mind and violated principles of natural justice. The court determined that initiating proceedings against a company already dissolved (effective 30/09/2022) is legally untenable. Consequently, the original orders and subsequent recovery proceedings were set aside, rendering them invalid. The court emphasized that administrative actions against a dissolved corporate entity lack legal sanctity and cannot be sustained.
HC quashed tax proceedings initiated against a dissolved company under GST Act, finding the impugned orders were passed without application of mind and violated principles of natural justice. The court determined that initiating proceedings against a company already dissolved (effective 30/09/2022) is legally untenable. Consequently, the original orders and subsequent recovery proceedings were set aside, rendering them invalid. The court emphasized that administrative actions against a dissolved corporate entity lack legal sanctity and cannot be sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
