Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC quashed tax proceedings initiated against a dissolved company under GST Act, finding the impugned orders were passed without application of mind and violated principles of natural justice. The court determined that initiating proceedings against a company already dissolved (effective 30/09/2022) is legally untenable. Consequently, the original orders and subsequent recovery proceedings were set aside, rendering them invalid. The court emphasized that administrative actions against a dissolved corporate entity lack legal sanctity and cannot be sustained.
HC quashed tax proceedings initiated against a dissolved company under GST Act, finding the impugned orders were passed without application of mind and violated principles of natural justice. The court determined that initiating proceedings against a company already dissolved (effective 30/09/2022) is legally untenable. Consequently, the original orders and subsequent recovery proceedings were set aside, rendering them invalid. The court emphasized that administrative actions against a dissolved corporate entity lack legal sanctity and cannot be sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
