Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The AAR determined that the developer-promoter's transaction involving undivided share of land and constructed residential units does not qualify as a "sale of land" under Item No. 5 of Schedule III of CGST Act. The Joint Development Agreement and subsequent sale of apartments attract GST liability. Despite the applicant's contention that the composite value represents land sale and should be exempt, the ruling clarifies that the transaction involves supply of service and goods, rendering GST applicable. The applicant must pay GST on the transaction value, with a permissible one-third deduction for land value, particularly for transactions executed before the completion certificate or first occupation of residential units.
The AAR determined that the developer-promoter's transaction involving undivided share of land and constructed residential units does not qualify as a "sale of land" under Item No. 5 of Schedule III of CGST Act. The Joint Development Agreement and subsequent sale of apartments attract GST liability. Despite the applicant's contention that the composite value represents land sale and should be exempt, the ruling clarifies that the transaction involves supply of service and goods, rendering GST applicable. The applicant must pay GST on the transaction value, with a permissible one-third deduction for land value, particularly for transactions executed before the completion certificate or first occupation of residential units.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
