Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC allowed the petitioner's challenge to GST registration cancellation, directing the adjudicating authority to: (1) grant a personal hearing to the petitioner, and (2) decide the revocation application within two months of such hearing. The court recognized the petitioner's procedural grievance regarding non-resolution of the registration cancellation matter and mandated a time-bound resolution mechanism. The interim order provides the petitioner an opportunity to present their case and ensures a definitive outcome within a specified timeframe, thereby addressing the administrative delay in processing the GST registration revocation application.
HC allowed the petitioner's challenge to GST registration cancellation, directing the adjudicating authority to: (1) grant a personal hearing to the petitioner, and (2) decide the revocation application within two months of such hearing. The court recognized the petitioner's procedural grievance regarding non-resolution of the registration cancellation matter and mandated a time-bound resolution mechanism. The interim order provides the petitioner an opportunity to present their case and ensures a definitive outcome within a specified timeframe, thereby addressing the administrative delay in processing the GST registration revocation application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
