Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Page of 4921
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 98411 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80IA for windmill undertakings, finding that the four windmill undertakings fulfilled the statutory conditions at their formation. The tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order, determining that the windmill undertakings were established with entirely new machinery and thus eligible for deduction in the specified assessment years. Additionally, the tribunal rejected the revenue's challenge regarding excess physical stock, finding no substantial evidence to support the revenue's contentions and maintaining the CIT(A)'s original findings.
ITAT upheld the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80IA for windmill undertakings, finding that the four windmill undertakings fulfilled the statutory conditions at their formation. The tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order, determining that the windmill undertakings were established with entirely new machinery and thus eligible for deduction in the specified assessment years. Additionally, the tribunal rejected the revenue's challenge regarding excess physical stock, finding no substantial evidence to support the revenue's contentions and maintaining the CIT(A)'s original findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.