Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
HC allowed appeal, setting aside conviction and sentence of two accused in SEBI case. Court found insufficient evidence establishing appellants' direct involvement or role in the company. No documentary proof substantiated their position as directors or persons-in-charge. The original trial court's judgment of conviction under Section 24(2) read with Section 27 of SEBI Act was quashed, effectively exonerating the appellants from the one-year imprisonment and Rs. 10 lakhs fine originally imposed.
HC allowed appeal, setting aside conviction and sentence of two accused in SEBI case. Court found insufficient evidence establishing appellants' direct involvement or role in the company. No documentary proof substantiated their position as directors or persons-in-charge. The original trial court's judgment of conviction under Section 24(2) read with Section 27 of SEBI Act was quashed, effectively exonerating the appellants from the one-year imprisonment and Rs. 10 lakhs fine originally imposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
