Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment order under Section 74 of GST enactments. The court upheld the denial of Input Tax Credit due to the provisional nature of the credit and the supplier's failure to remit taxes to the government. The burden of proving the transaction's genuineness rests with the purchasing dealer. The court found no merit in the petitioner's arguments and conclusively rejected the challenge to the tax assessment, affirming the statutory provisions governing provisional credit and its reversal.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment order under Section 74 of GST enactments. The court upheld the denial of Input Tax Credit due to the provisional nature of the credit and the supplier's failure to remit taxes to the government. The burden of proving the transaction's genuineness rests with the purchasing dealer. The court found no merit in the petitioner's arguments and conclusively rejected the challenge to the tax assessment, affirming the statutory provisions governing provisional credit and its reversal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.