Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
201 to 220 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment order under Section 74 of GST enactments. The court upheld the denial of Input Tax Credit due to the provisional nature of the credit and the supplier's failure to remit taxes to the government. The burden of proving the transaction's genuineness rests with the purchasing dealer. The court found no merit in the petitioner's arguments and conclusively rejected the challenge to the tax assessment, affirming the statutory provisions governing provisional credit and its reversal.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment order under Section 74 of GST enactments. The court upheld the denial of Input Tax Credit due to the provisional nature of the credit and the supplier's failure to remit taxes to the government. The burden of proving the transaction's genuineness rests with the purchasing dealer. The court found no merit in the petitioner's arguments and conclusively rejected the challenge to the tax assessment, affirming the statutory provisions governing provisional credit and its reversal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.