Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC determined that the petitioner may file two appeals challenging orders dated 28th January 2025 and 1st February 2025 under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017. Pre-deposit shall be made only for the total amount of Rs. 81,41,737/- from the Order-in-Original dated 28th January 2025, comprising Rs. 64,31,703/- and Rs. 17,10,034/-. No additional pre-deposit is required for the Order-in-Original dated 1st February 2025. Appeals must be filed by 15th July 2025, and shall not be dismissed on grounds of limitation or lack of pre-deposit, but adjudicated on merits.
HC determined that the petitioner may file two appeals challenging orders dated 28th January 2025 and 1st February 2025 under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017. Pre-deposit shall be made only for the total amount of Rs. 81,41,737/- from the Order-in-Original dated 28th January 2025, comprising Rs. 64,31,703/- and Rs. 17,10,034/-. No additional pre-deposit is required for the Order-in-Original dated 1st February 2025. Appeals must be filed by 15th July 2025, and shall not be dismissed on grounds of limitation or lack of pre-deposit, but adjudicated on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.