Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
HC determined mango pulp's GST classification, affirming the 12% tax rate from 01.07.2017 based on precedent in Vimal Agro. The court validated Circular No. 179/11/2022-GST, rejecting petitioner's challenge to classification. The ruling mandates GST payment at 12% for mango pulp between 01.07.2017 and 18.07.2022, upholding show cause notices for differential tax recovery. Petition partially allowed, establishing definitive tax treatment for mango pulp under existing GST regulations.
HC determined mango pulp's GST classification, affirming the 12% tax rate from 01.07.2017 based on precedent in Vimal Agro. The court validated Circular No. 179/11/2022-GST, rejecting petitioner's challenge to classification. The ruling mandates GST payment at 12% for mango pulp between 01.07.2017 and 18.07.2022, upholding show cause notices for differential tax recovery. Petition partially allowed, establishing definitive tax treatment for mango pulp under existing GST regulations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.