Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that assessments under Section 153A were time-barred due to improper information exchange request. The tribunal relied on jurisdictional HC ruling which determined that references not complying with Indo-Swiss DTAA protocol's Article 14 cannot extend assessment limitation period. Specifically, requests made after 30/08/2010 violating the amending protocol's provisions were deemed invalid. Consequently, all challenged assessment orders and consequential penalty orders were set aside, affirming strict adherence to statutory limitation timelines and procedural requirements for international information exchange mechanisms.
ITAT held that assessments under Section 153A were time-barred due to improper information exchange request. The tribunal relied on jurisdictional HC ruling which determined that references not complying with Indo-Swiss DTAA protocol's Article 14 cannot extend assessment limitation period. Specifically, requests made after 30/08/2010 violating the amending protocol's provisions were deemed invalid. Consequently, all challenged assessment orders and consequential penalty orders were set aside, affirming strict adherence to statutory limitation timelines and procedural requirements for international information exchange mechanisms.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.