Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, rejecting the Assessing Officer's claim of deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e). The tribunal found no evidence of personal use of company funds, noting the cash seized belonged to the company and was held in a fiduciary capacity. The board resolution supporting the assessee's role as custodian was deemed relevant, and the land purchase was proven to be made through banking channels, not company cash. Consequently, the conditions for invoking Section 2(22)(e) were not satisfied, thereby dismissing the deemed dividend assessment.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, rejecting the Assessing Officer's claim of deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e). The tribunal found no evidence of personal use of company funds, noting the cash seized belonged to the company and was held in a fiduciary capacity. The board resolution supporting the assessee's role as custodian was deemed relevant, and the land purchase was proven to be made through banking channels, not company cash. Consequently, the conditions for invoking Section 2(22)(e) were not satisfied, thereby dismissing the deemed dividend assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
