Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
The AT partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the Rs. 10 lakh penalty and land confiscation order related to the first contravention. The tribunal maintained penalties for two additional contraventions: (1) receiving foreign remittances not in the name of specific directors, and (2) failing to submit statements to RBI within 30 days. The court distinguished between corporate entities and individual directors, rejecting the appellant's argument about ownership. The land situated in plot no. 313/1, Village Siolim (8075 sq. mtr.) was restored to the appellant, while other penalties remained in effect, effectively providing a nuanced partial relief to the appellant company.
The AT partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the Rs. 10 lakh penalty and land confiscation order related to the first contravention. The tribunal maintained penalties for two additional contraventions: (1) receiving foreign remittances not in the name of specific directors, and (2) failing to submit statements to RBI within 30 days. The court distinguished between corporate entities and individual directors, rejecting the appellant's argument about ownership. The land situated in plot no. 313/1, Village Siolim (8075 sq. mtr.) was restored to the appellant, while other penalties remained in effect, effectively providing a nuanced partial relief to the appellant company.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
