Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
HC dismissed the writ petition involving fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) availment. The Court held that adequate notice was provided to the Petitioner and, given the fraudulent nature of the case and potential impact on the GST regime, writ jurisdiction would not be exercised. The Petitioner was granted permission to file an appellate remedy by 15th July, 2025, with mandatory pre-deposit under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, ensuring the appeal would be adjudicated on merits without limitation bar. The petition was disposed of, directing the Petitioner to pursue alternative legal remedies.
HC dismissed the writ petition involving fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) availment. The Court held that adequate notice was provided to the Petitioner and, given the fraudulent nature of the case and potential impact on the GST regime, writ jurisdiction would not be exercised. The Petitioner was granted permission to file an appellate remedy by 15th July, 2025, with mandatory pre-deposit under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, ensuring the appeal would be adjudicated on merits without limitation bar. The petition was disposed of, directing the Petitioner to pursue alternative legal remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
