Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition involving fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) availment, declining to exercise judicial review. The court emphasized the significant impact on GST regime and exchequer, directing the petitioner to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal by 15th July, 2025, with mandatory pre-deposit, ensuring the appeal would be adjudicated on merits if filed within the prescribed timeframe. The petition was disposed of, reinforcing procedural constraints in tax-related fraudulent claims.
HC dismissed the writ petition involving fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) availment, declining to exercise judicial review. The court emphasized the significant impact on GST regime and exchequer, directing the petitioner to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal by 15th July, 2025, with mandatory pre-deposit, ensuring the appeal would be adjudicated on merits if filed within the prescribed timeframe. The petition was disposed of, reinforcing procedural constraints in tax-related fraudulent claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
