Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The AAR determined that the taxpayer's labor contract service for constructing 380 flats does not qualify as a pure labor service under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana. Despite being a sub-contract with a builder, the agreement involves supplying machines and materials beyond labor, rendering it ineligible for GST exemption under Notification No. 12/2017. Consequently, the service falls under HSN code 9954(xii), attracting a standard GST rate of 18% as a residuary construction service category, based on a comprehensive analysis of the contractual terms and applicable tax notifications.
The AAR determined that the taxpayer's labor contract service for constructing 380 flats does not qualify as a pure labor service under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana. Despite being a sub-contract with a builder, the agreement involves supplying machines and materials beyond labor, rendering it ineligible for GST exemption under Notification No. 12/2017. Consequently, the service falls under HSN code 9954(xii), attracting a standard GST rate of 18% as a residuary construction service category, based on a comprehensive analysis of the contractual terms and applicable tax notifications.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
