Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT dismissed the appeal regarding interest entitlement on pre-deposit under Section 35FF of Central Excise Act, 1944. The tribunal held that the appellant is not entitled to interest from the date of deposit until refund, but may receive interest as prescribed under Sections 11BB or 35FF. The decision relied on precedential rulings, specifically the Division Bench's interpretation in a prior case involving similar pre-deposit interest claims. The tribunal rejected the appellant's contention of interest calculation from deposit date, affirming strict adherence to statutory provisions governing pre-deposit interest calculations.
CESTAT dismissed the appeal regarding interest entitlement on pre-deposit under Section 35FF of Central Excise Act, 1944. The tribunal held that the appellant is not entitled to interest from the date of deposit until refund, but may receive interest as prescribed under Sections 11BB or 35FF. The decision relied on precedential rulings, specifically the Division Bench's interpretation in a prior case involving similar pre-deposit interest claims. The tribunal rejected the appellant's contention of interest calculation from deposit date, affirming strict adherence to statutory provisions governing pre-deposit interest calculations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
