Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC allowed the petition challenging the SCN issued beyond prescribed limitation period. The court found procedural irregularities in the notice, specifically the lack of opportunity for hearing, which violated principles of natural justice. The impugned order was set aside and remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority. The Petitioner was granted permission to file a reply by 15th July, 2025, with a mandatory personal hearing to be provided thereafter. The challenge to the extension of limitation through Notification 56/2023 remains pending before the Supreme Court, which influenced the HC's decision to provide procedural fairness.
HC allowed the petition challenging the SCN issued beyond prescribed limitation period. The court found procedural irregularities in the notice, specifically the lack of opportunity for hearing, which violated principles of natural justice. The impugned order was set aside and remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority. The Petitioner was granted permission to file a reply by 15th July, 2025, with a mandatory personal hearing to be provided thereafter. The challenge to the extension of limitation through Notification 56/2023 remains pending before the Supreme Court, which influenced the HC's decision to provide procedural fairness.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
