Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal regarding liquidator's fees. The tribunal found no entitlement to fees under Regulation 4(3) of IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, as sales realization of Rs. 78.47 crores was significantly less than liquidation costs of Rs. 132 crores. The liquidator's claim for Rs. 188,02,261/- was deemed not tenable, with no remaining realization for fee computation. The alternative request for reasonable compensation based on CIRP fees was also rejected. The appeal was conclusively dismissed with no fees payable to the liquidator.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal regarding liquidator's fees. The tribunal found no entitlement to fees under Regulation 4(3) of IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, as sales realization of Rs. 78.47 crores was significantly less than liquidation costs of Rs. 132 crores. The liquidator's claim for Rs. 188,02,261/- was deemed not tenable, with no remaining realization for fee computation. The alternative request for reasonable compensation based on CIRP fees was also rejected. The appeal was conclusively dismissed with no fees payable to the liquidator.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.