Limitation in customs appeals permits exclusion for bona fide refund proceedings, enabling restoration of Bill of Entry assessment challenges on merit...
Warehousing permission requires deposit at the designated bonded warehouse; unauthorised diversion triggers confiscation, redemption fine and importer...
HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim under GST regime, holding the department liable to refund the amount deposited in Electronic Cash Ledger. The court mandated interest calculation from 11th June 2018, recognizing procedural delays by the tax authorities. The department's failure to adhere to prescribed timelines under CGST Rules, specifically Rule 89 and Rule 90, resulted in the petitioner's entitlement to refund with applicable interest. The petition was disposed of with directions for immediate refund and interest computation.
HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim under GST regime, holding the department liable to refund the amount deposited in Electronic Cash Ledger. The court mandated interest calculation from 11th June 2018, recognizing procedural delays by the tax authorities. The department's failure to adhere to prescribed timelines under CGST Rules, specifically Rule 89 and Rule 90, resulted in the petitioner's entitlement to refund with applicable interest. The petition was disposed of with directions for immediate refund and interest computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
