Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the digital notice signed on 31.03.2021 but emailed and dispatched on 01.04.2021 did not vitiate reassessment proceedings under Section 147/149 of the Income Tax Act. The court determined that jurisdictional notice requirements were technically met, and subsequent steps taken by revenue authorities were valid. Despite potential procedural irregularities, the court dismissed the petitioner's challenge, affirming the reassessment proceedings as legally sustainable based on recent Supreme Court precedents regarding notice issuance and jurisdictional requirements.
HC held that the digital notice signed on 31.03.2021 but emailed and dispatched on 01.04.2021 did not vitiate reassessment proceedings under Section 147/149 of the Income Tax Act. The court determined that jurisdictional notice requirements were technically met, and subsequent steps taken by revenue authorities were valid. Despite potential procedural irregularities, the court dismissed the petitioner's challenge, affirming the reassessment proceedings as legally sustainable based on recent Supreme Court precedents regarding notice issuance and jurisdictional requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
