Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
NCLAT held that tribunal orders under Section 241 & 242 of Companies Act are enforceable as decrees under Section 424(3), but do not constitute formal decrees under CPC. The Adjudicating Authority correctly rejected applications seeking decree formulation, recognizing that tribunal orders have inherent power to modulate relief to meet justice without adopting rigid procedural formalities. The tribunal's order remains executable as a decree, but cannot be technically drawn as a traditional civil court decree. The appeal was disposed of, affirming the tribunal's discretionary power to determine appropriate relief mechanisms while maintaining the substantive intent of the original adjudication.
NCLAT held that tribunal orders under Section 241 & 242 of Companies Act are enforceable as decrees under Section 424(3), but do not constitute formal decrees under CPC. The Adjudicating Authority correctly rejected applications seeking decree formulation, recognizing that tribunal orders have inherent power to modulate relief to meet justice without adopting rigid procedural formalities. The tribunal's order remains executable as a decree, but cannot be technically drawn as a traditional civil court decree. The appeal was disposed of, affirming the tribunal's discretionary power to determine appropriate relief mechanisms while maintaining the substantive intent of the original adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
