PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
NCLAT held that tribunal orders under Section 241 & 242 of Companies Act are enforceable as decrees under Section 424(3), but do not constitute formal decrees under CPC. The Adjudicating Authority correctly rejected applications seeking decree formulation, recognizing that tribunal orders have inherent power to modulate relief to meet justice without adopting rigid procedural formalities. The tribunal's order remains executable as a decree, but cannot be technically drawn as a traditional civil court decree. The appeal was disposed of, affirming the tribunal's discretionary power to determine appropriate relief mechanisms while maintaining the substantive intent of the original adjudication.
NCLAT held that tribunal orders under Section 241 & 242 of Companies Act are enforceable as decrees under Section 424(3), but do not constitute formal decrees under CPC. The Adjudicating Authority correctly rejected applications seeking decree formulation, recognizing that tribunal orders have inherent power to modulate relief to meet justice without adopting rigid procedural formalities. The tribunal's order remains executable as a decree, but cannot be technically drawn as a traditional civil court decree. The appeal was disposed of, affirming the tribunal's discretionary power to determine appropriate relief mechanisms while maintaining the substantive intent of the original adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.