Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
AT upheld the provisional attachment order against the appellant, finding insufficient evidence to substantiate the source of Rs. 4.05 crores. Despite claims of income from salary and property sale, the appellant failed to provide credible documentation supporting the fund's origin. The tribunal noted suspicious cash deposits, undisclosed property transactions, and alleged recruitment bribery. The court determined the funds were proceeds of crime under money laundering statutes, rejecting the appellant's explanations as untrustworthy. Consequently, the provisional attachment order was confirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.
AT upheld the provisional attachment order against the appellant, finding insufficient evidence to substantiate the source of Rs. 4.05 crores. Despite claims of income from salary and property sale, the appellant failed to provide credible documentation supporting the fund's origin. The tribunal noted suspicious cash deposits, undisclosed property transactions, and alleged recruitment bribery. The court determined the funds were proceeds of crime under money laundering statutes, rejecting the appellant's explanations as untrustworthy. Consequently, the provisional attachment order was confirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.