Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
AT determined appellants failed to substantiate legitimate income sources for property acquisitions between 1980-2013. Bank account scrutiny and investigation revealed significant cash deposits and property purchases without verifiable financial origins. Despite claims of gifts and agricultural income, no credible evidence was presented to justify asset accumulation. The tribunal found properties in names of multiple family members were acquired through undisclosed funds, rendering attachment under PMLA Section 5(1) valid. Consequently, the appellants' challenges were rejected, and all appeals were summarily dismissed, confirming the original property attachment order.
AT determined appellants failed to substantiate legitimate income sources for property acquisitions between 1980-2013. Bank account scrutiny and investigation revealed significant cash deposits and property purchases without verifiable financial origins. Despite claims of gifts and agricultural income, no credible evidence was presented to justify asset accumulation. The tribunal found properties in names of multiple family members were acquired through undisclosed funds, rendering attachment under PMLA Section 5(1) valid. Consequently, the appellants' challenges were rejected, and all appeals were summarily dismissed, confirming the original property attachment order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
