Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
HC ruled that the Petitioner is entitled to interest on refund claim, with nuanced calculations. Interest shall be payable from 7th/9th September, 2019 till 9th June, 2023 at varying rates (6% initially, then 9%), with a deduction of 74 days corresponding to Petitioner's response time to deficiency memo. The court balanced the procedural delays by both tax authority and Petitioner, ultimately granting partial interest relief while accounting for respective timeline contributions. Petition disposed of with specific interest computation guidelines.
HC ruled that the Petitioner is entitled to interest on refund claim, with nuanced calculations. Interest shall be payable from 7th/9th September, 2019 till 9th June, 2023 at varying rates (6% initially, then 9%), with a deduction of 74 days corresponding to Petitioner's response time to deficiency memo. The court balanced the procedural delays by both tax authority and Petitioner, ultimately granting partial interest relief while accounting for respective timeline contributions. Petition disposed of with specific interest computation guidelines.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
