Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC ruled that under CGST Act Section 54(11), the Department cannot withhold a refund sanctioned by the Appellate Authority based solely on potential revenue risk or alleged fraud. Without a pending appeal or review challenging the Appellate Authority's order, the Department must release the refund with statutory interest. The petitioner is authorized to seek further legal recourse if the refund is not credited by the specified date, affirming procedural safeguards against arbitrary administrative discretion in tax refund processes.
HC ruled that under CGST Act Section 54(11), the Department cannot withhold a refund sanctioned by the Appellate Authority based solely on potential revenue risk or alleged fraud. Without a pending appeal or review challenging the Appellate Authority's order, the Department must release the refund with statutory interest. The petitioner is authorized to seek further legal recourse if the refund is not credited by the specified date, affirming procedural safeguards against arbitrary administrative discretion in tax refund processes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
